|
US Currency
has not always contained the motto, "In God We Trust," here
is the short history.
In the late
1940s some religionists thought it was about time that the motto
was placed on our paper currency to thank the Lord for preserving
us through the terrible war that had just ended [ignoring the
fact that the German army had the motto "Gott mit Uns" (God
with us) inscribed on their belt buckles].
In 1953, one
Matthew R. Rothert of Arkansas, president of the Arkansas Numismatic
Society, presented the idea of putting "In God We Trust" on
all paper money to a meeting of his group. The favorable reaction
by his audience prompted him to send a written proposal for such
a change to Treasury Secretary Humphrey, but he also sent copies
of the correspondence to Commerce Secretary Weeks and to President
Eisenhower. This single letter prompted the Eisenhower administration
in June 1955 to recommend to Congress a bill (H.R. 619) that
would "[provide] for the inscription of 'In God We Trust'
on all United States currency and coins."
Introduced
into the House, a representative from Florida characterized the
object of the bill as, "...in these days when imperialistic
and materialistic communism seeks to attack and destroy freedom,..." a
way to "...strengthen the foundations of our freedom. At
the base of our freedom is our faith in God and the desire of
Americans to live by His will and His guidance. As long as this
country trusts in God, it will prevail. To serve as a constant
reminder of this truth, it is highly desirable that our currency
and coins should bear these inspiring words '"In God We
Trust.'"
Emboldened
by the rapidity with which the Congress embraced the use of the "In
God We Trust" motto on paper money, Congressional forces
still energized by rampant McCarthyism and anti-Communism thought
it the opportune time to make the "In God We Trust" motto
the "national motto." Introduced on March 22, 1956,
H.R. Res. 396 was quickly approved and signed into law on July
30, 1956 (36 U.S.C. Section 186), thus completing the campaign
of the religionists to instill the Christian nation idea into
the consciousness of all Americans through the agency of a few
individuals who found a way to circumvent the normal safeguards
of liberty enshrined in the United States Constitution.
[ Source: http://home.flash.net/~lbartley/au/issues/godtrust.htm ]
[ The American
Family Association delivers "In God We Trust" poster
to US Congress: http://www.afajournal.org/archives/24050000394.asp ]
Some
feel that this statement is a clear violation of church and
state.
The Freedom
From Religion Foundation, Inc. has sued the federal government
to have "In God We Trust" removed from currency and
as our national motto.
The motto
was put on all paper currency by an Act of Congress in 1955.
The phrase was chosen as our national motto by an Act of Congress
in 1956. It first appeared on paper currency in 1957.
The Foundation
lawsuit was dismissed by a 10th-circuit federal judge on the
grounds that "In God We Trust" is not a religious phrase.
The Foundation appealed the dismissal.
[ May 1996:
In God We Trust Appealed To High Court http://www.ffrf.org/fttoday/may96/igwt.html]
[ June/July 1996: US Supreme Court Turns Down Foundation Appeal http://www.ffrf.org/fttoday/june_july96/igwt.html]
Does
the Motto Pass the "Lemon Test" for constitutionality?
The three-pronged
Lemon test for constitutionality under the First Amendment was
delineated in the majority opinion written by Chief Justice Warren
Burger in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) as
- "First,
the statute must have a secular legislative purpose;
- Second,
its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances
nor inhibits religion;
- Finally,
the statute must not 'foster an excessive government entanglement
with religion.'"
This view
was affirmed in, for example, Committee for Public Education
and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist (413 U.S. 756, 1973), which
declared New York parochial school aid unconstitutional. Recently.
several court observers have questioned the usefulness of the
Lemon test, and although it has not been formally overruled,
many recent establishment clause cases have been decided without
referring to it. Nevertheless, it is the opinion of many observers
that the laws specifying the national motto and providing for
the placement of the motto on currency and coins of the United
States clearly fail all three parts of the Lemon test.
The
First Amendment to the Constitution reads:
"Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
..."
Freedom of
religion is guaranteed to us twice in our Constitution: the freedom
OF religion (to practice as we choose); and the freedom FROM
religion.
In the United
States, and in our city, any individual has the legal right to
practice any conviction as they see fit. It is vitally important
that we preserve this freedom, and that we do not establish a
government imposed "State Religion" in the United States.
The Constitution
instructs us that our government and the citizens of this City
are to be protected from the harm of those people who would use
their religious belief to hurt other citizens. ALL laws and all
of our community efforts and interests should be for the welfare
of society - and not directed at the punishment of sins. In our
country are evangelists and zealots of many different political,
economic and religious persuasions whose fanatical conviction
is that all thought is divinely classified into two kinds - that
which is their own - and that which is false and dangerous. The
radical right has an agenda and all citizens in our free society
are at risk from a movement that seeks to promote aggression
against innocent people, transform hatred into law, and stealthily
seize control of the mechanisms of government.
Wake up, America!
This pseudo-religious assault on personal freedom will affect
you, your children, your community, and your government if it
is not challenged and contained!
"In
Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak
up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came
for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't
a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't
speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me,
and by that time no one was left to speak up." Martin
Niemoeller (1892-1984)
|